Close the loop — from posture to action
Scoring controls is only half the job. Boards and SROs want to know whether residual exposure is acceptable and what is being done about the gaps. CyConex connects assessment outcomes to your stated risk appetite and turns findings into remediation actions.
That shifts the conversation from "have we met the requirement?" to "is the residual risk acceptable for this organisation, and what happens next?"
Early access · Free · No credit card required
CyConex helps you capture risk context and compare assessment outcomes against your stated risk appetite.
This makes assessments sharper: evidence is judged against the outcomes your organisation has said are unacceptable, not just against generic framework wording.
Where coverage is weak, an AI remediation chat drafts remediation actions and produces downloadable Word, Excel, or text artifacts.
This gives teams a concrete starting point for closing gaps, while assessors and owners decide what to accept, prioritise, and action.
CyConex supports a scope asset register with AI-suggested assets, helping teams define the essential functions and systems in scope for an assessment.
Clear scope makes both the assessment and the risk conversation more defensible.
Align assurance to risk appetite and drive remediation with CyConex — sign up free for early access.
Early access · Free · No credit card required
CyConex is an AI-assisted cyber assurance platform built for UK NCSC CAF assessments. It ingests evidence, surfaces it against contributing outcomes and IGPs, and helps qualified assessors reach evidence-led judgements faster — turning days of assurance work into minutes.
CyConex is built for continuous assurance. You can run recurring assessments on a schedule, track an assurance history and control timeline across cycles, and publish a live shareable heatmap that stays current for boards and regulators — not just a point-in-time snapshot.
No. AI agents accelerate evidence gathering and review, but accountability stays with qualified assessors. Reviewers validate scope, review IGP judgements, and approve every output that goes into a formal report, so conclusions remain defensible.